John Q. Public wrote:Source of the post by John Q. Public » Sat Oct 14, 2017 9:42 pm
Now here's where your hypocrisy is.
I didn't say it was "locker room talk", and I didn't say it wasn't. My point was that Trump did not admit what Hillary said he admitted. Clear?John Q. Public wrote:Source of the post by John Q. Public » Sun Oct 15, 2017 12:42 am
I'll leave it with you to reconcile with yourself why one is "just locker room talk" but the other, much older and less substantiated one is a serious character flaw that we all should be terribly upset about.
Bick wrote:Source of the post Can either political party claim the moral high ground on this?
Professor Fate wrote:Source of the post Even the Daily Mail says that Hillary "falsely claimed Trump is an 'admitted sex assaulter,' as she compares him to Harvey Weinstein - but claims allegations against Bill are 'clearly in the past.' "
Professor Fate wrote:Source of the post And you know none of Weinstein's victims will do the same, HOW?
John Q. Public wrote:Source of the post Interesting that you'd bring up the half-black Harris. The last one of those we had was pretty clean. Nice family man - with a nice family. No skeletons. Except for that one about his birth certificate. Harris' parents are Indian and Jamaican. This could be fun.
Bick wrote:We're too busy trying to make a point about which shade of crap is more brown with an audience that has zero interest in being objective.
Bick wrote:Source of the post I suppose the idea of Harris being considered as a presidential candidate shouldn't be all that surprising given the low bar of the past 2 presidents.
Bick wrote:Of course I wasn't referring to you JQP. Clearly you're the poster child of objectivity.
Bick wrote:Source of the postI think the bar should be set a little higher.
Users browsing this forum: Brandwatch [Bot] and 2 guests