Page 4 of 4

Re: Cantlay vs Woods: Best High School golfer from OC?

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:07 pm
by Omar Bongo
inflagrantedelicto wrote:Are the words "Congratulations", "Nicely done", or "Good job" in your vocabulary?
Did he change his name officially to Servite's Patrick Cantlay? He's a grown man who earned $316,000 for finishing tied for 4th in a golf tournament. Go ahead and take all the umbrage you can muster, I think he'll get by just fine without my homage.

Re: Cantlay vs Woods: Best High School golfer from OC?

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:07 pm
by joefutbol
You took the time to look up the leaderboard of the Genesis Open, look up the World Golf Rankings, go back to the leaderboard to see where the top players I mentioned finished, find a player who finished higher and might disparage Patrick Cantlay's accomplishment, go back to the World Golf Rankings and look that player up to confirm that would be the case, and finally come on here with all your research and say "meh." Every time I see one of your posts I can't stop reading it in the "People from Phoenix are Phoenicians" voice.

Re: Cantlay vs Woods: Best High School golfer from OC?

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:22 pm
by Omar Bongo
It took you longer to write that than it did for me to do it

Re: Cantlay vs Woods: Best High School golfer from OC?

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:20 am
by joefutbol
I type about 100 words per minute. If you did all that in under one minute then you'd be correct. But, solely based on your other 5,146 posts, you aren't.

Re: Cantlay vs Woods: Best High School golfer from OC?

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:47 am
by Omar Bongo
Less than a minute to compose that post, write it, edit it, preview it and submit it. What else can I say? Congratulations, nicely done, good job...

Re: Cantlay vs Woods: Best High School golfer from OC?

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:22 am
by joefutbol
Well, there you go moving the goalposts again. You said "to write." I don't recall composing anything. I thought composing and writing were the same thing (probably why I'm such a poor writer). However, it did take me at least ten seconds to find the correct YouTube video and another ten to insert it into the post. Since that involves copying and pasting and not writing I didn't think it was fair to include it the first time. Pressing the "Preview" button and making sure the video inserted correctly took about three more seconds. After the "Preview" it took me at least three-tenths of a second to click the "Submit" button. If I do review and/or revise a post I do that part after I actually submit, so I would hesitate to add that time into the calculation here. But, what the hell.... 20 more seconds. Using the new goalposts that brings us to exactly 103.3 seconds. Did I still beat you?