Another Regrettable "solution" involving Stem-Cell Research

Space, the environment, new discoveries and new uses for old ones
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 26392
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:21 pm

Another Regrettable "solution" involving Stem-Cell Research

Post by GOODave » Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:17 am

Found this Article in Christianity Today. Don't let the source dissuade you, though: If you go there and you're not a Christian, your arms (or other appendages) will NOT fall off (at least I have it on the highest authority).
Hybrid Test Drive
Advances in stem-cell technology cheer and alarm ethics watchers.

Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra
11/16/2007 08:42AM

While scientists in the U.S. hailed sperm cells as a possible alternative to embryonic stem cells, regulators in Great Britain became the first to approve inter-species experimentation.

The U.K.'s Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, which reports to the Department of Health, ruled in September that there was no "fundamental reason" not to use animals as egg donors for the creation of animal-human hybrid embryos. Currently, researchers depend on human embryos from fertilization clinics.

Hybrid embryos are created by scraping an animal's DNA out of its egg and inserting a nucleus from a human cell. Researchers don't know yet if hybrid embryos will display the developmental flexibility that human embryos do. "But the odds are high," said William B. Neaves, president and CEO of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research. "It's worth trying."

Still, development of a human-animal chimera should worry everyone who values human life, said Nigel Cameron, president of the Institute on Biotechnology & the Human Future.

"This is a wake-up call that really does catch people's moral imagination," he said. "The whole notion of manufacturing human or semi-human life for experimentation and destruction goes to the core of human dignity."

The director of the Center for Bioethics & Human Dignity, C. Ben Mitchell, said the "yuck factor" alone is not a good reason to ban hybrid embryos. People once found organ transplants and blood transfusions disgusting, too, he said.

"However, the intuitions, the yuckiness, the Franken-bunny [aspect] ought to raise a caution for us," Mitchell said. "We have no clue what we are doing, and we ought to have a respectful awe for the process of life, rather than a willy-nilly tinkering around with it."
A possible alternative to embryonic stem cells may be found in the work of researchers at Weill Medical College of Cornell University. A team there announced in September that it had turned early-stage sperm cells from mice into cells capable of growing into various tissues. Whether these cells have the potential to become any of the 200-plus cell types in the body, as embryonic stem cells do, remains to be seen, Neaves said. Another drawback: Manipulated sperm cells may only be used in men, meaning women would not benefit from any potential treatments.
I tend to agree with Cameron, above, when he states "The whole notion of manufacturing human or semi-human life for experimentation and destruction goes to the core of human dignity." And would also extend that comment to include the dangerous notion that we can mix-and-match genes with impunity.

I believe the pursuit of knowledge should have limits and I'm sure some of you will disagree with that, too.


Post Reply