Then how come when I post a link that has some influential policy-maker or leftist organization calling for a global government or redistribution of wealth from rich nations to poor nations, you leftists have never bothered to explain and/or prove why they are nothing but BS conspiracies?
The liberal response on this board is alwasy the same to discomforting information backed up with links:
1) Bleats of conspiracy and an occasional tin foil hat thrown in.
2) No explanation as to why my sources are wrong.
3) Run and hide to avoid explaining why they are BS.
As to them being *my* conspiracy theories, how could this be possible? All I do is find this stuff from credible leftist sources and post them. I never claim they are conspiracies. Its you leftists who bleat conspiracy after reading what I post.
Fordama wrote:I long ago posted the traits differentiating between skeptics--of which you are not--and denialist--of which you are one.
I've always been skeptical of the claim that the majority of the recent warming is human caused. Because of this, you call me a denialist.
And then I created a thread with a PNAS paper that shows half of the recent warming is from nature to which you haven't yet had the balls to make a comment in
And to rub your face in the dirt, I then added Gore's comment on how CO2 only is responsible for about 40% of the warming. Doing the math, that means at best, 20% of the recent warming has been caused by human CO2
which means I was right in my skepticism and you are wrong to believe the scientists as well as you're wrong to call me a denialist.
Fordama wrote:The game was over then--you just didn't realize it and keep cherry-picking, anomaly hunting, and shotgunning.
The amount of stupidity and ignorance you continually show on this point is astounding! Perhaps that is why you've never had the balls to comment in that thread... the science in it must really wad your tin foil panties in the crack of your democrat.