$4 Trillion/Yr global carbon tax needed to prevent bad weather

Space, the environment, new discoveries and new uses for old ones
User avatar
Posts: 8805
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:38 pm

$4 Trillion/Yr global carbon tax needed to prevent bad weather

Postby kramer » Wed May 31, 2017 12:24 pm

...and for "paying out household rebates, alleviating poverty and fostering low-carbon infrastructure"!

Another article that shows I've been always right when I've said climate change is being used for a number of left-wing goals such as global redistribution of wealth and to build economic infrastructure so companies can move production to new places with low labor costs.

Another thing a tax like this accomplishes is that it gets rich people off the hook of being taxed more of their own vast wealth for social programs such as to alleviate poverty. In short, you leftists are literally being duped by rich people again, similar to when the DNC elite and Obama leveraged the collective stupidity of the DNC base to pass Obamacare according to Jonathan Gruber, the architect of Obamacare.

You are believing in a cult movement that if they win, will result in the middle-class paying the bulk of taxes to reduce global poverty reduction and other social programs just like the majority of US middle class now pays the bulk of the costs for the health care of people who can't afford it.

Led by Professor Nicholas Stern, who produced the groundbreaking Stern Report in 2006, and Professor Joseph Stiglitz, who won the Nobel Prize for economics in 2001, the experts suggested a price for a tonne of carbon dioxide of $50 to $100 (£39-78) by 2030.

Read more here:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environmen ... 63376.html

Link includes the link to the (often a recipient of funding by the ultra-leftist Rockefeller Foundation) world bank report.

Joseph Stigliz is Clinton's former economic adviser and is also a member of Socialist International, a global ultra leftist organization that was brought back to life after WWII by communists but then a few years later at the height of the McCarthy hearings, claimed to disavow communism probably because their PR dept said it looks bad.

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

- Scientist James Lovelock

Return to “Science and Technology”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest