CO2 115K yrs was 280, Hansen says temperature back then were same as today

Space, the environment, new discoveries and new uses for old ones
User avatar
kramer
Posts: 8805
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:38 pm

CO2 115K yrs was 280, Hansen says temperature back then were same as today

Postby kramer » Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:57 am

From Columbia's Earth Institute, (which is run by a Party of European Socialist member and formally under George Soros puppet control. The two aren't related, nothing to see here, just some fun facts...):

Global warming in the past 50 years has raised global temperature (Fig. 1) well above the prior range in the Holocene (the current interglacial period, approximately the past 11,700 years) to the level of the Eemian period (130,000 to 115,000 years ago), when sea level was 6-9 meters (20-30 feet) higher than today.

Full article can be read here.


If I've read this correctly, according to James Hansen (who at least once received free legal assistance from George Soros, just another fun fact with nothing to see here..), temperatures today are at the same level as they were 115K to 130K years ago but, 115k to 130k years ago the temperature and bad weather control know (CO2) was much lower than today, it was around 270 to 280ish. See graph below;


So:
1) Am I misunderstanding what was stated in the excerpt above? If yes, then what does it say?
2) Could it be a typo?
3) If it is correct, then how could the temperatures back then when the temperature/bad-weather control know was dialed down to way down to 280 ppm-ish be the same as today?

(graph of Antarctica ice core CO2 levels spliced with recent M. L. data:)
Image

Another fun fact: In the Antarctic ice core data of temperature and CO2, the changing level of CO2 follows the change in temperature. In other words, the temp changes first and then the CO2 changes. Al Gore's inconvenient truth and a host of MSM sources and even NASA have lied or deliberately mislead about this fact. That said, it may be that some day, that they'll find out that the CO2 changed first and then temp follows (which is what they are looking for so they have a pre-conceived bias that it exists which it may). But that didn't stop them from lying or misleading us...


“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

- Scientist James Lovelock

Return to “Science and Technology”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest