John Q. Public
I take you are OK with the laws as they stand.
I just think that the people that want to laws changed don't really know what they want or what the current laws are.
"How stupid is our country?"
I'm waiting to see what happens as much as you are, but the PE has made statements, made claims, and promised to do things he is now backing away from...they guy is a head case, and he is the PE. Most people see that. You apparently don't. People are not happy with the choices that have been made. It is a volatile situation fueled by Trump bombast and promises. What will happen to that great silent minority who honestly but naively believed Trump is the second coming of Jesus? At some point their voices will want to be heard. Are you confident Trump will deliver anything that will move us successfully into the future?
John Q. Public
You mean people like Trump? I agree.
No, I mean people like you that believe we need to have immigration reform.
What does Trump have to with what the immigration reform people want to change? NOTHING. I am just trying to see if those reform people have any idea what they want to reform.
All I have heard is amnesty and never any reform ideas.
From this forum either there is no one that is for immigration reform or if they are, they have no idea what laws they would liked changed.
Indicating that you haven't read my comments about him, Paul.
People are not happy with the choices that have been made.
"People" elected him president, largely because the one you preferred was correctly identified as a corrupt, devious thug. So they chose the lesser of two evils and now you are complaining about the lesser evil.
............who honestly but naively believed Trump is the second coming of Jesus?
Which, ignoring the paternalistic hyperbole, is simply another example of that supercilious contempt you and others have for "the great unwashed." But you are too intellectually isolated to recognize it. Had Clinton been the preferred candidate, she would have been elected. That simple. If you don't like some of Trump's comments. Neither do I (which I imagine is why he's dropping some of them now). But at least he's not the prevaricating pestilence we might have elected....................Luca
People" elected him president, largely because the one you preferred was correctly identified as a corrupt, devious thug. So they chose the lesser of two evils and now you are complaining about the lesser evil.More unfounded soundbites.........Wabash
build a wall at the border! But - it never progressed because of supposidly political culture at the
time (the Republicans caved) and Bush's supposed friendship with Vicente Fox.
The money is still earmarked for the wall if and when it's approved, interesting, no?
But we already know Clinton is a crook and don't trust her. It's quite a distinction to elect such an a priori known quantity...........Luca
after they gave amnesty to three million illegals during the Reagan administration and that border
security would actually be adhered to and enforced.