First Charges filed by Mueller

broman
Posts: 3759
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:52 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by broman » Tue Jul 23, 2019 11:45 am

PTG, your repose to me directly referencing the Mueller Report is a video on Russian comedians crank calling Adam Shiff. Slow down and think about it......

Playthegame
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Playthegame » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:08 pm

Actually Broman it was for you and others as well, watch, and then look at your post and follow your own advice...seems like a lot you have trouble with this sort of thing...

Playthegame
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Playthegame » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:23 pm

Wabash wrote: I believe both sides are innocent till proven guilty. The subject here is Mueller and his report relating to Trump's alleged activities.
Well we already know, HRC wiped her server, which had 33,000 government emails on it, that is proven by the government, FBI to be clear. And lo and behold, no obstruction charge, in fact no charges at all, and where is Ol Jerry? Adam? Many on this board? Equal justice? Nope...but I like your Constitutional slant there on the law...yet many including yourself just claimed
Wabash wrote: Or it could be they are telling the absolute truth and Trump is actually as much more corrupt than they are reporting.
The President is corrupt and no proof, after a 2 yr witch Hunt by McCabe, Strok, Page, throw in a little Weinstein over reach and bad boy behavior and still...no collusion, no obstruction, big fat double nothing burger but plenty of your hypocrisy...sometimes I just think we could put you on the border and save a lot a cash...aint nothing getting past that wall...bricks ](*,)

Playthegame
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Playthegame » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:35 pm

Wabash wrote: Then why all the lies and secrecy? We know one thing for sure. Their actions are not those of innocent people...........Wabash
Wabash wrote: I believe both sides are innocent till proven guilty.
Well...that didn't last very long...
Last edited by Playthegame on Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Wabash
Posts: 24190
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:29 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Wabash » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:35 pm

Playthegame wrote: Well we already know, HRC wiped her server, which had 33,000 government emails on it, that is proven by the government, FBI to be clear. And lo and behold, no obstruction charge, in fact no charges at all, and where is Ol Jerry? Adam? Many on this board? Equal justice? Nope...but I like your Constitutional slant there on the law...yet many including yourself just claimed
HRC is not the one being investigated in this case. Nor is Mueller going to discuss her tomorrow.
Playthegame wrote:The President is corrupt and no proof, after a 2 yr witch Hunt by McCabe, Strok, Page, throw in a little Weinstein over reach and bad boy behavior and still...no collusion, no obstruction, big fat double nothing burger but plenty of your hypocrisy...sometimes I just think we could put you on the border and save a lot a cash...aint nothing getting past that wall...bricks
Which also isn't going to be discussed by Mueller tomorrow.

Despite your personal attacks on me, Mueller is testifying tomorrow.

And while you claim it is a "nothing burger" the Trump team has lied about all of it from the start. Hardly the behavior of an innocent person.
They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

User avatar
Wabash
Posts: 24190
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:29 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Wabash » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:38 pm

Playthegame wrote: Well...that didn't last very long...
I didn't say anyone was guilty. I said they don't act like they are innocent. Big difference.
They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

Playthegame
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Playthegame » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:42 pm

Wabash wrote: Despite your personal attacks on me, Mueller is testifying tomorrow.
You might be a millennial...ist...
Wabash wrote: And while you claim it is a "nothing burger" the Trump team has lied about all of it from the start. Hardly the behavior of an innocent person.
The abuses started before the Mueller investigation, my God man, you need to do a little digging...
Wabash wrote: HRC is not the one being investigated in this case. Nor is Mueller going to discuss her tomorrow.
Same guys who investigated HRC investigated Trump, only they wrapped it up in a couple months, no charges even tho Prosecutor Comey...oh wait...said she committed nothing that a prosecutor would have confidence in bringing charges against, yet he is not a prosecutor and it was not his call to make, no objection by anyone! It is relevant for that fact alone...
Last edited by Playthegame on Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Wabash
Posts: 24190
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:29 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Wabash » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:52 pm

Comey's actions or lack thereof are not going to be discussed tomorrow during Mueller's hearing.

So your constant attempt at deflection is not relevant.
They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

Playthegame
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Playthegame » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:55 pm

Well good chance his actions will be...you certainly do not know either way and you live in the universe of deflection as is obvious from your posts...all 23,803 of them...

Playthegame
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Playthegame » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:56 pm

Nice playing with you Wabash...I have to go do my homework now...

User avatar
Wabash
Posts: 24190
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:29 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Wabash » Tue Jul 23, 2019 3:03 pm

It's obvious.
They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

User avatar
Al Koholik
Posts: 815
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 9:39 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Al Koholik » Tue Jul 23, 2019 5:07 pm

Here’s the problem with whacky conspiracy theories... ESPECIALLY the Deep State type you seem to relish in propagating.
And it’s actually the same trepidation I held with regard to Mueller finding a conspiracy in partnership with Russians.
For such to occur, for ANY of this to be true, the number of people and layers of coverup and conspiracy would be so great that history, human nature and human fallibility would dictate that SOMEONE involved or in-the-know directly or peripherally would either slip-up, flip, tell the wrong confidant, be struck with a case of conscience, succumb to pressure of authorities.
It’s tantamount to the ridiculous and repulsive DS false flag theories about Sandy Hook, Vegas and others. It’s just not plausible.
Let alone the fact that you are sorely miss informed.
Do you even know who originally contracted and paid for the Steele dossier?
How many FBI and congressional investigations has Hillary and the crew been subject to? And how many indictments? And don’t answer with more deep state conspiracy. It’s still not plausible.
Do you have any experience Or discernible knowledge in law, constitutional or otherwise, other than your viewing of Fox News legal pundits?
You sure seem to think you do.
If you will please let us know when it all comes crumbling down for Hillary and her deep state cohorts?

User avatar
John Q. Public
Site Admin
Posts: 19163
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:56 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by John Q. Public » Tue Jul 23, 2019 5:46 pm

One more witch down.
Trump transition adviser convicted on foreign-agent charges

A federal jury on Tuesday convicted Bijan Rafiekian, a former business partner of Michael Flynn, on a pair of foreign-agent felony charges stemming from work the two men did for Turkish interests during the final months of the Trump presidential campaign in 2016.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/ ... ed-1428176
Don't look at me, I just work here.

User avatar
Al Koholik
Posts: 815
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 9:39 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Al Koholik » Tue Jul 23, 2019 5:58 pm

The Best People. Though I was not a fan, not a fan.
I don’t know him. He only worked for the transition for a very short time.

User avatar
John Q. Public
Site Admin
Posts: 19163
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:56 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by John Q. Public » Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:41 pm



Nervous, Bro? You sound nervous.

T-minus 10 hours and I haven't heard anything to give me the impression Democrats have realized Mueller isn't going to expound on any of their questions. He's Mueller. His answers are going to be "Yes" and "No". If they don't have questions ready in that format, their performances are going to be as embarrassing as Jordan's.
Don't look at me, I just work here.

Playthegame
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Playthegame » Tue Jul 23, 2019 8:44 pm

You may have heard it here first...just sayin...

Playthegame
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Playthegame » Tue Jul 23, 2019 8:49 pm

Wabash wrote: It's obvious
seriously had me ROFL...made me laugh hard...

Playthegame
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:23 pm

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Playthegame » Tue Jul 23, 2019 8:55 pm

Al Koholik wrote: For such to occur, for ANY of this to be true, the number of people and layers of coverup and conspiracy would be so great that history, human nature and human fallibility would dictate that SOMEONE involved or in-the-know directly or peripherally would either slip-up, flip, tell the wrong confidant, be struck with a case of conscience, succumb to pressure of authorities. It’s tantamount to the ridiculous and repulsive DS false flag theories about Sandy Hook, Vegas and others. It’s just not plausible. Let alone the fact that you are sorely miss informed. Do you even know who originally contracted and paid for the Steele dossier? How many FBI and congressional investigations has Hillary and the crew been subject to? And how many indictments? And don’t answer with more deep state conspiracy. It’s still not plausible. Do you have any experience Or discernible knowledge in law, constitutional or otherwise, other than your viewing of Fox News legal pundits? You sure seem to think you do.If you will please let us know when it all comes crumbling down for Hillary and her deep state cohorts?
BlaBlaBla dude! You're not credible...the above is AlKo speak...gobble-di gook...read the paper tomorrow and get up to speed...but hey...the avatar fits...

User avatar
John Q. Public
Site Admin
Posts: 19163
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:56 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by John Q. Public » Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:00 pm

Odd scheduling, too. The Judiciary Committee doing Part 2 at 9:30 AM Eastern, then the Intelligence Committee doing Part 1 around noon Eastern. I guess the results are all that matters, but I'd think they'd have done them in order.
Don't look at me, I just work here.

User avatar
Al Koholik
Posts: 815
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 9:39 am

Re: First Charges filed by Mueller

Post by Al Koholik » Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:22 pm

But of course. Stumped by the Dossier question. Or distinct dissonance. So in lieu of substantive and coherent rebuttal I get juvenile deflections.
At the very least, a man of any intelligence, integrity, empathy and living in reality would immediately repudiate the false flag conspiracy theories of the aforementioned mass murders of innocent men, women and children. Political ideology notwithstanding, that crap is cruel, dangerous and flat out sick buck bonkers.
But again.
Please enlighten me as to the genesis of the Steele Dossier and the original financing behind it.
C’mon Now. You spew so much so fast yet you can’t support one little assertion?
As for the biting wit (read: you’re a tool) in reference to my Username and avatar or whatever... really, is that all you got? But I’d rather be diluted than deluded. So cheers.
Thanks for playing though. Thought maybe you’d give me some game... with at least some credible facts to support your assertions and some coherent and substantive rebuttal. But alas, after poring over some of your previous posts, WTF was I thinking?

Post Reply