First Charges filed by Mueller

[Tommy Tar]

Refer to the report.
Refer to the report.
Refer to the report.
I can't talk about this.
Refer to the report.
I can't talk about that.
What was the question?
What was the question?
I can't talk about that.
I can't speak to that.

[Fordama]

But don't forget about the part where he said Trump could be charged with obstruction of justice when he leaves office.

That was fun.

[John Q. Public]

And a Republican asked the question.

Overall,
Mueller was good;
Republicans were good;
Democrats were meh (especially not effective on the "other recourses" question);
Both were preaching to their respective choirs;
We'll have to wait to see if any minds were changed.

[broman]

Dems should of spent more time on Trumps non answers of collusion and conspiracy. The obstruction case is pretty solid imho.

[broman]

Nothing changes until you get a Trump under oath in public...

[John Q. Public]

The Democrats didn't build their case well and they spent too much time on the criminal offenses and not enough on the abuses of power, which are the ones that are grounds for impeachment.

And Nunes just gave a very strong argument in Russia's defense.

[Wabash]

QR_BBPOST And Nunes just gave a very strong argument in Russia's defense.

I have to let that one sink in. Especially after being on this planet for almost seven decades listening to republicans yell, "better dead than red."

[broman]

I yield my time to Nicole Wallace of MSNBC...... "Where is the repudiation by the GOP of the report?"

[John Q. Public]

I'm sure getting confused. The fake report written by the angry Democrats exonerates Trump of collusion but neither of those is a thing anyway, so............

I think I need a drink.

[Professor Fate]

Had enough? Is it time to turn to actually legislating?

[Wabash]

It was never enough when the Benghazi was being investigated.

I know many Trump supporters cannot grasp this concept.

Congress (at least the Dems) is capable of multi-tasking.

[Wabash]

Three biggest takeaways.

1. Trump was not exonerated from the Mueller report.

2. Mueller would have indicted Trump were it not for the opinion of the Office of Legal Counsel that a sitting president cannot be indicted.

3. Mueller said Trump could be indicted after leaving office.

[Red]

Once again and again millions of times the democrats looked liked the angry clown mob they are! Mueller, a once decent man, but one dumb person fell on his sword for Hillary. LOL.

[Red]

The next time somebody speaks about how dumb Dan Quayle is/was, I will remind them, they have Mueller. What very low IQ idiot he is.

[Red]

A swing and a miss JQP.

[Red]

Mueller is a fool. He should have never been there. He had no clue what went on, unless he is liar and stupid. Another good day for Trump. 4 more years.

[Al Koholik]

The FACTS IN EVIDENCE regardless of ones perception of the messenger, speak for themselves.
When the law is on your side... pound the law.
When the facts are on your side... pound the facts.
When neither... pound the messenger and scream “Stupid Liar!!!”.

[Wabash]

Exactamundo.

[Al Koholik]

I imagine it was his low IQ that account for his advanced education and found him in the elite positions he has held. Cmon Red. Your speaking in Trumpese, the most hideous form of spoken word. Anyone who doesn’t see things as you do is STUPID, FOOL, LOW IQ. It’s an obvious pattern that impugns your credibility with regard to have anything but a complete and total “Ours is the ONLY true religion... all others are doomed to burn in Hell for their stupidity and foolishness and low IQs”

[broman]

What cult do you have to be in to publicly insult Bob Mueller in defense of Donald "Grab em" Trump?