Yes, you did. Luca and I took issue with this statement:
I responded by asking what the parallel for that is in our time. He had not provided one.
Then You stuck your nose in and tried to offer an entirely different statement Broman had made as the parallel to the first statement, which you were forced to admit, it wasn't.
I questioned how the second statement was the parallel in our time, for his first statement:
and you admitted it wasn't:
Then you tried to pull a bait-and-switch, by questioning me on the 2nd sentence, which I hadn't disputed in the first place.
That's moving the goal posts away from the original question that Luca and I first asked which was: What is the parallel in todays world, of this example Broman gave: