RPW wrote: I still find it scary the people who actually support this president and are walk among us in California.
Trump just raised $15 MILLION in California this week. I'd say you have underestimated the number of Californians who support the president, and walk among you.
Professor Fate wrote: Trump just raised $15 MILLION in California this week. I'd say you have underestimated the number of Californians who support the president, and walk among you.
I didn't underestimate anything. Stupidity and blind allegiance is typically tied to the pocketbooks of fools. Support the Republican Party is wonderful - supporting this ********** is unacceptable.
California has over 39 million people. Can you provide the breakdown of how many people gave money to him?
Hmm, haven't heard a peep about all the "winning" for a while, could this be why?
The launch of an impeachment inquiry in the House wasn’t the only bad news President Trump faced last week. By late Friday, three different federal courts had shot down three of the president’s more draconian policies aimed at shutting off the flow of migrants into the U.S.
The cascade of court defeats began early Friday when U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee ruled in Los Angeles against the administration’s “Kafkaesque” plan to undo the 1997 Flores Agreement that limits the length of time and conditions under which the government may hold migrant minors.
In a separate case involving how Immigration and Customs Enforcement targets jail inmates for deportation, U.S. District Judge Andre Birotte Jr. in Los Angeles held that the government must stop relying solely on databases that included “incomplete data, significant errors, or were not designed to provide information that would be used to determine a person’s removability.”
Birotte also ruled that ICE cannot issue “detainers” — which involve holding inmates after their scheduled release dates so they can be picked up for deportation — in states that do not authorize such cooperation.
In the third decision, U.S. District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson in Washington, D.C., blocked the administration’s proposed policy to expand to the entire country the so-called expedited removal process that bypasses immigration courts.
If I understand this morning's events:
--A Court ordered Trump's accountant's to turn over his tax records to Congress;
--Another Court declared that Trump's Emergency Declaration to build the Wall was invalid;
--Another Court enjoined Trump's regulation to keep out legal immigrants;
"Trump's former ambassador the Ukraine testified to Congressional investigators that she was removed from her job after a pressure campaign mounted by two people working under Giuliani's direction on Trump's legal defense, who were arrested on corruption charges while trying to flee the country.
In total there is 1 user online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 0 guests (based on users active over the past 15 minutes) Most users ever online was 1865 on Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:05 pm
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 0 guests