Ah .. O.K., gotcha:Fordama wrote:He's brought some fancy pieces of propaganda.
So you DIDN'T read them.
Cool.
Ah .. O.K., gotcha:Fordama wrote:He's brought some fancy pieces of propaganda.
Now that makes sense.Fordama wrote: I agree. However, if you look at the manufactured outrage concerning these recent emails, the actual warming is what is getting attacked--even though no evidence to the contrary is actually presented.
Fordama
As opposed to the objective view from the Global Warming community? Puleez.Fordama wrote:He's brought some fancy pieces of propaganda.
Fordama
The focus of the outrage should not be on the warming itself. It is rightly placed on the manipulation and omission of data to improve the desired results as well as the attempts to prevent legitimate peer review and access to the data.Fordama wrote:I agree. However, if you look at the manufactured outrage concerning these recent emails, the actual warming is what is getting attacked--even though no evidence to the contrary is actually presented.
Fordama